Visual stimulation is fast becoming a celebrated mode of learning, from the classroom to business pitches and even on social media. Doubtless, it is easier to pass a message across through visual modeling. The same principle has been adopted in the courtroom with accident reconstruction animation.
With this method of evidence, many complex evidence processes are simplified. This helps the court get to the root of the matter in record time. It also ensures justice prevails due to the accuracy of the reconstructed facts of the case.
What is Accident Reconstruction?
Accident reconstruction is a branch of causation forensics that focuses on understanding how and why an accident occurred. It is accomplished first by accurately interpreting the clues left by the residual physical evidence of the accident. Afterward, there will be a reconstruction and analysis of the events before, during, and after the accident.
Accident reconstructionists essentially work in reverse. They record and examine the scene’s facts to draw conclusions regarding the accident’s cause and course of action.
Numerous elements that contributed to the accident could be revealed by reconstruction. This can include speeding, ignoring red lights and stop signs, turning and lane-change mistakes, loss of control as a result of an automobile part failing or a flaw in the vehicle, hazardous driving conditions, and difficulty seeing.
As a case in point, the facts on the accident scene helped the state find out the person driving the vehicle in Mintun v. State. In this case, the plaintiff sustained enough injury to make him forget who had been driving. Unfortunately, the only other person in the vehicle had died already. Hence, the onus of proving the at-fault party fell on the state.
With the use of accident reconstruction animation, the state could work backward. They gathered evidence from the crime scene and identified the person driving the vehicle at the time of the accident.
What Does Accident Reconstruction Animation Entail?
Accident reconstruction animation combines forensic investigation, 3D visualization, and analysis. Therefore, when we talk about accident reconstruction animation, we are talking about the intersection between forensic science in accident investigation and the animating of the result of the evidence. It is a collision between science and evidence.
Accident reconstruction animation can be used in various cases as long as it has to do with the accident. It can be vehicular accidents, train accidents, bicycle collisions, forklift accidents, or even ships.
Whatever the type of accident and its specific cause, forensic investigation makes use of tangible evidence. This can be garnered from the accident to prepare an accurate report of the incident. Accident reconstruction animation will then harmonize the investigation’s details and create it into an accurate and easy-to-understand 3D model in court.
How Useful Is Accident Reconstruction Animation In Court?
An accident reconstruction animation is extremely useful in court solely because of the reliability of this form of evidence. In creating this evidence, accident reconstructionists go through many processes to arrive at the findings.
This mode of evidence is reliable. However, the expert reconstructionist must be able to give a scientifically accurate rundown of the process that led to the conclusion. Its reliability and accuracy make it readily accepted and embraced in the courtroom. This can be seen in the recent case of Pugh v. State. In this case, the state was able to prove that the appellant hit the victim with his vehicle. This was done using a scientifically accurate accident reconstruction animation. The accuracy and reliability of the case led the court to render it admissible.
Additionally, accident reconstruction animation simplifies court processes in more ways than can be explained. Giving an audio representation of an accident may be difficult and taxing for the jury to comprehend. Animating the forensic findings helps the court not only visualize the flow of events but also assists them in understanding them faster than they would have should the evidence be in other formats.
Another way accident reconstruction animation can be useful is to combat insurance companies. If an insurance company contests the origin of the victim’s injuries, accident reconstruction may help connect the injury to the incident.
Sometimes, insurers may argue that the injuries were brought on by anything other than the collision. Accident reconstruction could assist in demonstrating the severity of the injuries if the insurance company is not providing full compensation for your sustained damage.
In this vein, the accident reconstruction animation will focus on distinct aspects of the incident and how it caused some specific damage. For instance, in a car crash reconstruction, the animation can show the view of the collision with the other vehicles, showcasing the damage caused to the vehicle.
The animation can then go on to show the same accident but with an inside view of how the impact affected the victim’s body in the vehicle. With all of these combined, the animation would have considered the full issues present in the case in depth.
However, one factor in ensuring admissibility is the accuracy of the scientific processes involved in creating the animation. You can guarantee accuracy and admissibility with a phenomenal forensic engineering company known for success in court cases.
Fox-AE is a company known as the industry’s icon for creating legally admissible and high-settlement accident reconstruction animation in court cases. With years of experience and service, we have been able to serve many clients, helping them attain justice as well as heavy monetary settlements in court cases.
With a long forensic engineering and animation portfolio, we have experts qualified to give credence to the accident reconstruction animation created in good faith. We have created a lot of animations on this subject for different clients satisfactorily.
Do you have a potential case? You can reach out right now.